Author Archives: Joe Kaatz

Unknown's avatar

About Joe Kaatz

Staff Attorney at the Energy Policy Initiatives Center, University of San Diego School of Law.

What is the Current State of Data Centers in California and How Does the State Plan for It

Data centers are becoming an ever-increasing focus both because of their impacts to communities and ratepayers and because candidates are having to answer to voters on this issue with the midterm elections weeks away. This is the first in a … Continue reading →

Posted in Air Pollution, CAISO, CEQA, CPUC, Data Centers, EDAM, Energy, IERP, Large Load, Markets +, SPP, WEIM | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NEM 3.0 Decision: 1st Appellate District Affirms Original Opinion in Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission

(Note: Original Draft was updated and edited on 3/10/26 and 3/11/26) On March 9, 2026, the First Appellate District affirmed in full the CPUC’s D.22-12-026 decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission (Case No. A167721). The First … Continue reading →

Posted in CPUC, Energy, GHGs, Greenhouse Gas, Legislation, Litigation, Renewable Energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Update on Petitions Against the CPUC Since August 2025

(Updated 3/3/26 at 3pm with additional cases) This post is an update on previous posts (here and here) related to the remanded petition for the Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California in the … Continue reading →

Posted in CPUC, Energy, Legislation, Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Questions Will be Answered by the Appeals Court as it Applies a Less Deferential Standard to the CPUC in its Review of the CPUC’s Net Billing Tariff Decision

This is a follow up to my previous blog post on the California Supreme Court’s Opinion that remitted the Center for Biological Diversity v. CPUC (A167721; S283614) to the 1st Appellate District. With supplemental and responsive briefing filed on November … Continue reading →

Posted in CPUC, Energy, Legislation, Litigation, Renewable Energy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Recent California Supreme Court Opinion in Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission Upends Decades of Statutory Interpretation Deference to CPUC

On August 8, 2025, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission, S284614 (August 7, 2025)) on a single issue of law specific to the degree of deference afforded to the California Public … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

EPCA Preemption: What are its limits and How May it Harmonize with the Direct Regulation of Emissions from Appliances

This is Blog #4 on this this topic that will look at two issues.  First, where is the line between what is preempted and what is not under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA)? This will look at rules … Continue reading →

Posted in Air Pollution, All-electric, APCD, Building Peformance Standard, Energy, Energy Efficiency, EPCA, GHGs, Greenhouse Gas, Litigation, Nitrous Oxides, Ozone, Reach Codes | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Legislative Update: End of 2024 Legislative Session

The deadline for the Governor to sign or vetoes bills passed on September 30th. The Governor has called an extraordinary session where nine bills were introduced. So far, ABX2-1 and ABX2-9 appear to be active while the other seven may … Continue reading →

Posted in Air Pollution, All-electric, APCD, CEQA, CPUC, Energy, GHG targets, GHGs, Greenhouse Gas, Legislation, Renewable Energy, Transportation, Vehicle Miles Traveled, VMT | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blog # 3 on EPCA Litigation: What can the Limited Case Law Tells Us About Interpreting the EPCA?

This blog will continue the discussion on the EPCA specific to two past, unpublished EPCA cases that predate the litigation against the City of Berkeley. The first is a building performance regulation that applied to both existing and new construction … Continue reading →

Posted in All-electric, Building Peformance Standard, climate planning, Energy, Energy Efficiency, EPCA, Federal Preemption, GHG targets, GHGs, Litigation, Reach Codes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Blog # 2 on EPCA Preemption: Benchmarking as the Basis of Building Performance Standards: What Did the State of Colorado and City of Denver Implement?

This is the second blog post in this series looking at the requirements that the State of Colorado and City of Denver adopted to implement building performance standards (Blog # 1 can be accessed here). It will review the benchmarking … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Blog #1 on Energy Policy Conservation Act (“EPCA”) Preemption Lawsuit filed Against State of Colorado and City of Denver

On April 22, 2024, the Colorado Apartment Association, Apartment Association of Metro Denver, Colorado and Lodging Association, Inc., and NAIOP Colorado Chapter filed a complaint in federal district court against the State of Colorado and City of Denver challenging building … Continue reading →

Posted in Air Pollution, All-electric, Energy, Energy Efficiency, EPCA, Federal Preemption, GHGs, Greenhouse Gas, Legislation, Litigation, Reach Codes | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments